leading human rights lawyer objects to a delay to work on a possible written constitution for Scotland, while other experts dispute whether one is necessary or workable Share 16 inShare0 Email Would a written constitution for an independent Scotland hamper or enhance justice and civil rights? Lawyers are divided Photograph: Ian Waldie/Getty Images Should detailed work and debate on a putative written constitution for Scotland start now, and not wait until a yes vote for independence, then the next Holyrood elections in 2016? A senior human rights lawyer, John Scott, believes so. Scott, vice convenor of the Scottish wing of the influential legal group Justice, and chair of the Howard League for Penal Reform Scotland, believes the shape and focus of that constitution ought to be central to the public debate on independence before the autumn 2014 referendum. He expects Justice would be "very supportive" of the increasingly firm proposal from Alex Salmond, set out in